May 17, 2011
CONTACT: Holly Auer
Genetic Variation Impacts Brain Opioid Receptors in Smokers, Penn Study Shows
Genes Impacts Brain's Chemical Response to Nicotine; New Insights May Lead to New Medications to Help Smokers Quit
Nearly everyone who has tried to quit smoking says it's incredibly difficult, and the struggle is due in part to genetic factors. Now, a new study from the Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania sheds light on how one specific genetic risk for smoking relapse may work: Some of the difficulties may be due to how many receptors, called "mu opioid" receptors, a smoker has in his or her brain. The results, published online this week in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, may lead to the development of new treatments that target these receptors and help smokers increase their chances of success when they try to quit.
"For the first time we've identified a mechanism that explains why people with a particular genetic background may be more prone to relapse when they try to quit smoking," says senior author Caryn Lerman, PhD, the Mary W. Calkins Professor of Psychiatry and Interim Director of the Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania. "These smokers have a greater number of mu opioid receptors that respond to brain chemicals such as beta-endorphin which are released by nicotine. And having more available receptors of this type appears to be related to finding nicotine more rewarding. We've connected the dots between the genes, the brain, and the behavior."
Lerman and colleagues used positron emission tomography (PET) to measure the amount of mu opioid receptors in the brains of smokers. They found that the amount of receptors in the areas of the brain associated with rewards and emotions was related to an individual's genotype. Specifically, smokers who have two copies of the common "wild-type" version of the mu opioid receptor gene had significantly more receptors available, compared to smokers who inherited at least one genetic variant of the mu opioid receptor gene.
When the study participants reported the degree of satisfaction gained from either a normal cigarette or one that lacked nicotine, there was no difference associated with the individuals' genotype. However, there was an association between greater reported reward and more receptor expression in people who carried at least one copy of the genetic variant.
Because individuals who have two wild-type copies of the mu opioid receptor gene have more receptor available in their brain, they may benefit most from drugs that block the receptor's activity.
"Although opioid medications have been tested for use for smoking cessation, the results have been mixed," Lerman says. "However, if we know more about their brain mu opioid receptor availability, we may be able to predict who will respond to this type of drug." This will be the subject of future research.
Lerman acknowledges that using sophisticated imaging studies on every smoker isn't feasible because of cost and other logistical constraints. However, this study and future studies that build on it may help researchers translate the receptor expression data into ways to guide smokers to success when they aim to quit. For example smokers who have more available mu opioid receptors may be more responsive to mu opioid receptor blocking medications.
Lerman also points out that although the team only looked at the impact of genetics on mu opioid receptor expression and rewards in the context of tobacco addiction, the results may translate to other type of addictive behaviors for which mu opioid receptors play a role.
The first author on the study is Riju Ray from the University of Pennsylvania. Co-authors include Kosha Ruparel, E. Paul Wileyto, James Loughead and Julie A. Blendy also from the University of Pennsylvania, Andrew Newberg from Thomas Jefferson University, Chaitanya Divgi from Columbia University, Jean Logan from Brookhaven National Laboratory, and Jon-Kar Zubieta from the University of Michigan.
This research was funded by grants from the National Institute on Drug Abuse and the National Cancer Institute.
Penn Medicine is one of the world's leading academic medical centers, dedicated to the related missions of medical education, biomedical research, and excellence in patient care. Penn Medicine consists of the Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania (founded in 1765 as the nation's first medical school) and the University of Pennsylvania Health System, which together form a $4.3 billion enterprise.
The Perelman School of Medicine has been ranked among the top five medical schools in the United States for the past 17 years, according to U.S. News & World Report's survey of research-oriented medical schools. The School is consistently among the nation's top recipients of funding from the National Institutes of Health, with $392 million awarded in the 2013 fiscal year.
The University of Pennsylvania Health System's patient care facilities include: The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania -- recognized as one of the nation's top "Honor Roll" hospitals by U.S. News & World Report; Penn Presbyterian Medical Center; Chester County Hospital; Penn Wissahickon Hospice; and Pennsylvania Hospital -- the nation's first hospital, founded in 1751. Additional affiliated inpatient care facilities and services throughout the Philadelphia region include Chestnut Hill Hospital and Good Shepherd Penn Partners, a partnership between Good Shepherd Rehabilitation Network and Penn Medicine.
Penn Medicine is committed to improving lives and health through a variety of community-based programs and activities. In fiscal year 2013, Penn Medicine provided $814 million to benefit our community.