December 23, 2011
CONTACT: Holly Auer
Penn Researchers Shorten Time for Manufacturing of Personalized Ovarian Cancer Vaccine
Faster Immunotherapy May Be Applicable to Many Tumor Types
PHILADELPHIA -- Researchers from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania are in the midst of testing a personalized, dendritic cell vaccine in patients with recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer – a group of patients who typically have few treatment options. Now, they have shown they can shorten the time to manufacture this type of anti-cancer vaccine, which reduces costs of manufacturing the treatment while still yielding powerful dendritic cells that may be beneficial for these and a variety of other tumor types. The data is published in the December issue of PLoS ONE.
“We are very excited about this development,” says senior author George Coukos, MD, PhD, who directs the Ovarian Cancer Research Center in Penn’s Abramson Cancer Center. “Our work proves that these dendritic cells can be manufactured with a reasonable cost and retain their potency after being loaded with patients’ tumor extract. This is a very personalized approach to immunotherapy, which can be easily prepared for most patients with ovarian cancer undergoing surgery to remove their tumors.”
Cancer researchers have long predicted that vaccines that stimulate a patient's own immune system to attack tumors should be able to control the disease. The use of dendritic cells is one especially promising avenue for immune therapy, particularly for patients with small tumors or those who are in remission. In ovarian cancer, this condition is often possible to achieve after aggressive surgery and conventional chemotherapy. At that point, dendritic cells presenting tumor antigen, and properly activated with a microbial extract (lipopolysaccharide) and cytokines, become able to mobilize the immune system to attack the cancer and restrain tumor progression.
Previous work from Penn showed that dendritic cell vaccines developed in culture over two days could shrink of pre-invasive breast cancers in patients when a single protein antigen was used with the dendritic cells. However, dendritic cell vaccines prepared from the cellular debris of whole tumors -- which is thought to be more powerful than single antigens -- previously required seven days of maturation in a dish.Coukos and colleagues report that in preclinical tests, dendritic cells exposed to pieces of whole tumors, called tumor lysate, and matured in culture for four days are just as robust as dendritic cells grown for seven days.
To determine whether a shorter maturation period was possible, the team isolated peripheral blood monocytes, a type of white blood cell, from ovarian cancer patients and healthy volunteers. Using established clinical-grade protocols, the team induced the cells to differentiate into immature dendritic cells and then exposed them to whole tumor lysate for two, four, or seven days.
When they compared protein markers on cells’ surfaces, they found that the majority of the dendritic cells remained immature at two days, whereas the majority of the cells were mature at day four. The difference, the authors explain, means that the day-four cells have machinery in place to process and present the complex mixture of proteins and antigens present in a whole tumor lysate. By contrast, the immature day-two cells can present a single peptide antigen on their surface, but lack the machinery to process the larger proteins or more complex mixtures of proteins, like those present in whole tumor lysate.
The team found that day-four dendritic cells exposed to whole tumor lysate induced T-cell responses from both patient and healthy donors in test tube experiments, and that the responses were similar to those triggered by day-seven dendritic cells.
"Given the overall superior performance of whole-tumor lysate preparations over molecularly defined antigens for cancer vaccines and the overall superiority of dendritic cell-based vaccines, our results provide important preclinical data for the rapid development of potent, highly immunogenic vaccines for treating many tumor types," says lead author Cheryl Lai-Lai Chiang, PhD, a post-doctoral researcher in the Center for Ovarian Cancer Research.
More information about the vaccine clinical trial is available at clinicaltrials.gov.
Additional authors include Andrea R. Hagemann, Rachel Leskowitz, Rosemarie Mick, Thomas Garrabrant, Brian J. Czerniecki, Lana E. Kandalaft, and Daniel J. Powell Jr.
The current study was funded by the National Cancer Institute Ovarian Specialized Program of Research Excellence (P01-CA83638); the University of Pennsylvania Abramson Cancer Center National Cancer Institute Core Support Grant (P30-CA-016520); the Ovarian Cancer Research Fund; and the Immunotherapy Initiative for Ovarian Cancer.
Penn Medicine is one of the world's leading academic medical centers, dedicated to the related missions of medical education, biomedical research, and excellence in patient care. Penn Medicine consists of the Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania (founded in 1765 as the nation's first medical school) and the University of Pennsylvania Health System, which together form a $4.3 billion enterprise.
The Perelman School of Medicine has been ranked among the top five medical schools in the United States for the past 17 years, according to U.S. News & World Report's survey of research-oriented medical schools. The School is consistently among the nation's top recipients of funding from the National Institutes of Health, with $392 million awarded in the 2013 fiscal year.
The University of Pennsylvania Health System's patient care facilities include: The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania -- recognized as one of the nation's top "Honor Roll" hospitals by U.S. News & World Report; Penn Presbyterian Medical Center; Chester County Hospital; Penn Wissahickon Hospice; and Pennsylvania Hospital -- the nation's first hospital, founded in 1751. Additional affiliated inpatient care facilities and services throughout the Philadelphia region include Chestnut Hill Hospital and Good Shepherd Penn Partners, a partnership between Good Shepherd Rehabilitation Network and Penn Medicine.
Penn Medicine is committed to improving lives and health through a variety of community-based programs and activities. In fiscal year 2013, Penn Medicine provided $814 million to benefit our community.