News Release
March 18, 2016

Proactively Treating HIV Patients at Risk for Tuberculosis with Multi-Drug TB Regimens Doesn't Save More Lives

Simple TB Screening and Preventive TB Therapy Sufficiently Treats Patients, Penn-led Study Finds

PHILADELPHIA—The number one killer of HIV patients in resource-limited areas, including parts of Africa and India, is tuberculosis (TB), underscoring the need for optimal treatments and effective strategies to address this deadly co-infection. But TB is harder to detect in HIV-infected patients and diagnostic test results take time, so many healthcare providers prescribe multi-drug TB treatments as a precaution. However, for the first time, findings from a large, randomized clinical trial show that this aggressive approach does not save more lives, researchers from Penn Medicine and other institutions report in The Lancet.

The preventive therapy isoniazid—recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) for HIV patients in these areas—was well tolerated and resulted in similar survival rates compared to a four-drug TB treatment, the researchers found in a study of almost 850 patients from 18 different sites in 10 countries.

“We don’t necessarily need to subject all these patients to multi-drug regimens,” said Gregory P. Bisson, MD, MSCE, an assistant professor in the division of Infectious Diseases and a senior scholar at the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics at Penn’s Perelman School of Medicine, and co-lead author of the study. “This new study shows that simple TB screening and isoniazid is a sufficient course of HIV care for this group, despite their very advanced HIV disease stage. Our participants were able to tolerate isoniazid very well, and we saw no evidence that they developed drug resistance more commonly, as is often feared.”

The trial, known as REMEMBER (Reducing Early Mortality and Early Morbidity by Empiric Tuberculosis), involved centers and institutions working in various countries around the globe, including the Perelman School of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, and the University of North Carolina School of Medicine, among others. The 18 study sites were located in Malawi, South Africa, Kenya, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Uganda, Peru, Haiti, Brazil and India, all areas disproportionately affected by HIV and TB.

The WHO reports that in 2013 a quarter of all deaths among people living with HIV was due to TB.  However, TB screening rates remain low in resource-limited areas, according to the WHO, whose current guidelines recommend that healthcare providers screen HIV positive individuals for TB and use isoniazid to prevent TB in those who are not diagnosed with TB.

But healthcare providers have been concerned about following this recommendation because they don’t trust that TB screening is accurate, and are concerned that HIV-infected patients who receive isoniazid alone during undiagnosed, sub-clinical active TB will go on to develop resistance to the drug, Bisson said. TB is also hard to diagnose in HIV-infected patients, and it is particularly hard to diagnose in those with very advanced HIV disease because they don’t exhibit typical symptoms, such as a cough that produces the mucous used in most TB tests.

The fear of drug resistance and the low sensitivity of TB tests have led to less screening and underutilization of isoniazid, with providers often opting for the more proactive multi-drug approach. However, until now, the two strategies had never been evaluated in a clinical trial, according to the researchers.

“Moving forward, we need to implement quality improvement projects and guideline-driven care, and start thinking about systematic TB screening and isoniazid as a crucial piece of HIV care in this population,” said Bisson, who is a member of the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (ACTG), the network that conducted the trial, and the Penn Center for AIDS Research.

The research team performed a multi-country, open-label, randomized clinical trial between 2011 and 2014 comparing empirical TB therapy with isoniazid in HIV positive outpatients initiating antiretroviral therapy (ART). All patients had remarkably low CD4 counts indicating advanced HIV and a high risk for undiagnosed TB. All patients started ART; half started multi-drug treatment for TB (424 patients), and half started isoniazid alone (426 patients).

Approximately 1 in 20 patients from the study died over the ensuing 24 weeks; however, the study found that empirical tuberculosis therapy did not reduce mortality at 24 weeks of treatment compared with isoniazid preventive therapy. Twenty-two patients died or were lost from each group at week 24. What’s more, by week 24, the empirical group had a higher rate of AIDS progression than the isoniazid group (17 percent vs 13 percent). 

“The takeaway is that providers should screen HIV-positive patients for TB, as the WHO suggests, and patients who aren’t diagnosed with TB should receive isoniazid,” Bisson said. “And furthermore, if these advanced HIV patients can tolerate the isoniazid, less advanced HIV patients very likely can do well under this paradigm, too.”

Co-authors of the study include. Mina C. Hosseinipour, Sachiko Miyahara, Xin Sun, Agnes Moses, Cynthia Riviere, K. Kirui, Sharla Badal-Faesen, David Lagat, Mulinda Nyirenda, K. Naidoo, James Hakim, Peter Mugyenyi, German Henostroza, D. Leger, Javier R Lama, Lerato Mohapi, Jorge Alave, V Mave, Valdilea G. Veloso, Sandy Pillay, N Kumarasamy, Jing Bao, Evelyn Hogg, Lynne Jones, Andrew Zolopa, Johnstone Kumwenda, and Amita Gupta.

The results from the REMEMBER trial are part an upcoming TB issue in The Lancet to correspond with World TB Day on March 24.

The study was funded by National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases through the AIDS Clinical Trials Group (UM1 AI068634, UM1 AI068636, and UM1 AI106701).

Penn Medicine is one of the world's leading academic medical centers, dedicated to the related missions of medical education, biomedical research, and excellence in patient care. Penn Medicine consists of the Raymond and Ruth Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania (founded in 1765 as the nation's first medical school) and the University of Pennsylvania Health System, which together form a $5.3 billion enterprise.

The Perelman School of Medicine has been ranked among the top five medical schools in the United States for the past 18 years, according to U.S. News & World Report's survey of research-oriented medical schools. The School is consistently among the nation's top recipients of funding from the National Institutes of Health, with $373 million awarded in the 2015 fiscal year.

The University of Pennsylvania Health System's patient care facilities include: The Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania and Penn Presbyterian Medical Center -- which are recognized as one of the nation's top "Honor Roll" hospitals by U.S. News & World Report -- Chester County Hospital; Lancaster General Health; Penn Wissahickon Hospice; and Pennsylvania Hospital -- the nation's first hospital, founded in 1751. Additional affiliated inpatient care facilities and services throughout the Philadelphia region include Chestnut Hill Hospital and Good Shepherd Penn Partners, a partnership between Good Shepherd Rehabilitation Network and Penn Medicine.

Penn Medicine is committed to improving lives and health through a variety of community-based programs and activities. In fiscal year 2015, Penn Medicine provided $253.3 million to benefit our community.

Print/Share

Print version

Share/Save/Bookmark

Media Contact

Steve Graff
O: 215-349-5653
C: 215-301-5221

Other Contacts

Department of Communications
(Media Relations):

P: 215-662-2560
F: 215-349-8312

For Patients and the General Public:
1-800-789-7366

PennMedicine.org
Contact Penn Medicine

Media Resources

Contact Us|Facebook
Media Guidelines|Facts
Uplink Facility|Photos
RSS Feeds| Twitter