399 South 34th Street
Suite 2002 Penn Tower

Philadelphia, PA 19104

Phone: (215) 662-2560
Fax: (215) 349-8312

Media Contact
(for this release only)

Karen Kreeger
(215) 349-5658

Current News

Press Releases


Events & Calendars

August 16, 2004

X Marks the Spot: Vector Insertion is Viral Specific

Mapping integration sites has implications for
better-engineered gene therapies and new HIV drugs

(Philadelphia, PA) – Retroviruses are one of the most common vehicles for delivering therapeutic payloads via gene therapy in animal models of disease and human patients. Viruses integrate into host DNA to replicate, but exactly where they insert themselves has become a topic of increasing importance. This is of special concern when integration is near an oncogene that may lead to uncontrolled, cancerous cell growth.

Now, researchers at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine have completed the first whole-genome survey of where three commonly used retroviruses integrate into human DNA. The team, led by Frederic Bushman, PhD, Professor of Microbiology, compared vectors derived from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), murine leukemia virus (MLV), and avian sarcoma-leukosis virus (ASLV). (Click on thumbnail above to view full-size image). They found that HIV integrated near active genes; MLV near points on the chromosome where protein translation starts (which confirms earlier work by another lab); and ASLV integrated more randomly throughout the entire genome. That each studied virus preferred a unique integration pattern or site suggests that viruses home in on certain chromosomal features for inserting themselves within the genome. This work appears in the August 17 issue of PLoS Biology, a new open-access journal.

“There’s a picture forming of where different retroviruses integrate in human cells, and it seems to be quite different from virus to virus, which is not something anyone would have ever suspected,” says Bushman. “We can only speculate as to the mechanism at present, but one attractive idea is that retroviral-integration complexes bind to cellular DNA binding proteins attached to specific locations on chromosomes.” For HIV, integrating into active genes may help promote efficient viral gene expression. The reason for the choice of target is less clear in other retroviruses.

These findings are important for devising safer human gene-therapy vehicles. From studies in yeast, the researchers speculate that there is a system of biochemical recognition between proteins bound on human chromosomes and viral proteins, which helps guide integration, and that specific recognition seems to differ from virus to virus. “There’s a prospect of modulating or engineering that kind of system, once we understand it better to direct integration to different locations,” comments Bushman.

These findings can also help researchers understand how HIV enters cells in order to devise drugs to block that entry. “If there’s a key interaction required for growth of a virus, then that would be a target to inhibit,” says Bushman. HIV needs three enzymes – reverse transcriptase, protease, and integrase – to complete a full replication cycle. AZT and protease inhibitors stop activity of the first two, respectively, and the last one left to target is integrase, the object of a new AIDS drug recently tested in rhesus monkeys. “If there is a ‘targeting factor’ required for efficient replication, then blocking its function might obstruct viral replication,” says Bushman. “The clearest way forward is to inhibit the catalytic activity of the integrase protein and some of our future work is geared toward that.”

These are still early days in harnessing knowledge about viral integration in humans to make safer and more effective gene therapies, let alone new drugs against HIV. To that end, new information on targeting integration is likely to help guide design of better therapy, say the researchers.

Other members of the research team included Penn colleagues Rick S. Mitchell, Brett F.Beitzel, and Astrid R.W. Schroder, as well as Paul P. Shinn, Huaming Chen, and Joe R. Ecker from The Salk Institute and Charles C. Berry from the University of California at San Diego School of Medicine. This research was funded by the James B. Pendleton Charitable Trust, the Berger Foundation, and the National Institutes of Health.

For a printer friendly version of this release, click here.


PENN Medicine is a $2.5 billion enterprise dedicated to the related missions of medical education, biomedical research, and high-quality patient care. PENN Medicine consists of the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine (founded in 1765 as the nation’s first medical school) and the University of Pennsylvania Health System (created in 1993 as the nation’s first integrated academic health system).

Penn’s School of Medicine is ranked #3 in the nation for receipt of NIH research funds; and ranked #4 in the nation in U.S. News & World Report’s most recent ranking of top research-oriented medical schools. Supporting 1,400 fulltime faculty and 700 students, the School of Medicine is recognized worldwide for its superior education and training of the next generation of physician-scientists and leaders of academic medicine.

Penn Health System is comprised of: its flagship hospital, the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, consistently rated one of the nation’s “Honor Roll” hospitals by U.S. News & World Report; Pennsylvania Hospital, the nation's first hospital; Presbyterian Medical Center; a faculty practice plan; a primary-care provider network; two multispecialty satellite facilities; and home health care and hospice.

Privacy Policy Disclaimer Terms of Use