|
Home
>> Education
>> Residency Program
>> Assessing Resident Performance
Assessing Resident Performance
"The normal curve is a distribution
most appropriate to chance and random activity.
Education is a purposeful activity and we seek
to have students learn what we would teach.
Therefore, if we are effective, the distribution
of grades will be anything but a normal curve.
In fact, a normal curve is evidence of our failure
to teach."
Benjamin Bloom
Medical education research demonstrates that
the reliable assessment of
knowledge, clinical skills and attitudes of trainees
is a complex, multi-factorial process. Our program
has strengthened its overall approach in recent
years to reflect growing emphasis on educational
outcomes, observation of clinical performance,
and timely feedback to resident trainees. Effective
assessment contributes greatly to the purposeful
activity of teaching residents.
Within our program, educational objectives have
been developed for each required rotation and
for each PGY level. For elective rotations, residents
submit objectives for approval by the Education
Committee. These educational objectives define
the criteria by which residents successfully complete
each rotation and advance to the next academic
level.
At the beginning of each rotation, residents and
faculty are provided with a rotation- specific
curriculum package including detailed learning
objectives for that rotation. This initial meeting
is followed by a mid-rotation meeting whereby
residents and faculty discuss progress during
the rotation and needed adjustments. Finally,
at the end of each rotation faculty formally evaluate
the residents on the extent that they have met
the educational objectives of that specific rotation.
The Program Director reviews all completed performance
evaluations and meets with the resident as
necessary.
Consistent with principles of adult learning,
residents are invited to be proactive participants
in the evaluation process. This is intended to
be a collegial, collaborative process. Residents
are given formative feedback daily through interaction
with the assigned attending. It is the joint responsibility
of attending physicians to provide feedback to
the resident, and of the resident to ask for feedback.
Good performance is enhanced by all parties commitment
to providing feedback on a continuing basis.
Summative feedback is provided through a written
and/or web-based
evaluation system as follows:
- End of Rotation Evaluation by faculty
- PM&R Mini-CEX by faculty
(see http://www.mc.uky.edu/pmr/1stpage.asp
for further information)
- Biannual Evaluation of Resident Performance
by Program Director
- ABPM&R Anniversary Evaluation
- Senior performance review with Program Director
- Annual AAPM&R Self-Assessment Examinations
- Annual AAEM Self-Assessment Examinations (PGY-4s
only)
- 360 degree evaluation
Other assessment methods are currently being developed,
in order to address the requirements related to
the ACGME's Six
General Competencies.
The Program Director and faculty mentor are available
to provide counseling to help residents deal with
career choice and/or other issues related to participation
in the training program. Residents also are expected
to provide feedback to faculty on their teaching
skills, as well as on the overall residency program.
|